|
Malicious ProsecutionLots of people are tried for offenses and not found guilty. But you have limited rights in law to claim compensation in this case. You can claim compensation only if you can show you have been a victim of a 'malicious' (deliberately harmful) prosecution. You have to show four specific things to be able to claim compensation. These are as follows: .: The prosecution caused you damage or harm.You have to show that:-
.: You 'won' your case.You win your case if:-
.: The police did not have 'reasonable or probable cause' to prosecute you.You have to prove that:-
In most cases it is difficult to show either of these two things, and this is why there are very few claims for malicious prosecution. .: The police acted 'maliciously'.You have to prove that the police prosecuted you for an unacceptable reason. Sometimes you can do this by referring to something that a police officer said. Sometimes the circumstances make it clear that the police can't have been acting properly. As well as claims for malicious prosecution, it is possible to get compensation for miscarriages of justice if you were found guilty, and new facts have come to light which show that the conviction was a miscarriage of justice. .: Prosecuting an individual police officer. If you think that
an individual police officer has committed a criminal offence, you can
bring a private prosecution against them. You will need advice from a
solicitor before you do this, to make sure that you have enough evidence
and that the evidence is in the right form. Bear in mind that magistrates
or a jury can convict someone only if they are satisfied 'beyond reasonable
doubt' that the person is There are other difficulties with bringing a private prosecution. These are as follows.
If you win your case and the officer is found guilty, you can ask the court to make the officer pay:
However, the court won't automatically do this, and any compensation that you get will almost certainly be less than you would get if you sued the police. |
|